Showing posts with label Friends of the Earth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Friends of the Earth. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Friends of the Earth slams cruise lines for polluting waters

[caption id="attachment_20710" align="alignleft" width="300"]Carnival Cruise Line Carnival Cruise Line[/caption]

Editor:---"As the industry leader, Carnival Corp. has to step up its environmental game throughout all of its different lines," said Keever. "How can Carnival Corp. justify having more than half of its fleet continue to use outdated technology that pollutes our oceans and threatens our marine ecosystem health, sea life and all of us?"

This indictment of Carnival Corp. by Friends of the Earth comes on the heels of the incidents where passengers have faced bad conditions on board cruise ships that have had mechanical and safety issues that have caused considerable distress on a number of Carnival voyages.

In March of this year CNN pointed out three Carnival ships that had problems , with toilets backing up, lack of power and other inconveniences.

According to Friends of the Earth, Cruise ships dumped more than 1 billion gallons of sewage in the ocean last year.  Much of it is raw or poorly treated, leading the organization to call for stronger rules to protect the ocean waters, sea life and people.   The following is the narrative from the organization's website:

Friends of the Earth's 2013 Cruise Ship Report Card says some of the 16 cruise lines graded are getting greener, but more than 40 percent of the 162 ships still rely on 30-year-old waste treatment technology, leaving treated sewage with levels of fecal matter, bacteria, heavy metals and other contaminants harmful to aquatic life and people. By law, wastewater dumped within three nautical miles of shore must be treated, but beyond that ships are allowed to dump raw sewage directly into the ocean.

The Environmental Protection Agency says an average cruise ship with 3,000 passengers and crew produces about 21,000 gallons of sewage a day -- enough to fill 10 backyard swimming pools in a week. That adds up to more than 1 billion gallons a year for the industry -- a conservative estimate, since some new ships carry as many as 8,000 passengers and crew and the report card doesn't include the entire worldwide fleet. In addition, each ship generates and dumps about eight times that much "graywater" from sinks, showers and baths, which can contain many of the same pollutants as sewage and significantly affects water quality.

Sewage pollution can cause gastrointestinal diseases, diarrhea, hepatitis and other illnesses in people exposed through contaminated seafood or water. Fish, shellfish, coral reefs, and other aquatic life can suffocate due to surplus nitrogen and phosphorous from ship sewage.

"It's time for cruise ships to stop using our oceans as a toilet," said Marcie Keever, oceans and vessels program director for Friends of the Earth, whose report card is meant both to draw attention to the environmental impact of the booming cruise industry and to help cruise-goers choose the most environmentally responsible cruises. (A downloadable version of the Cruise Ship Report Card is available here.)

"This is an industry worth billions of dollars that could install the most advanced sewage treatment technology available for the cost of a single can of Coke per passenger," said Keever. "We're encouraged that some cruise lines are taking incremental steps to improve their performance, but the entire industry must stop hiding behind weak regulations and take action to make sure the oceans their ships travel remain as clear as the photos in cruise brochures. But we also need the EPA to adopt tougher treatment standards to protect our oceans and coasts from the waste of these floating cities."

Cruise ships are also responsible for significant amounts of air pollution from the dirty fuel they burn. Even at the dock, cruise ships often run dirty diesel engines to provide electrical power to passengers and crew. According to the EPA, each day an average cruise ship is at sea it emits more sulfur dioxide than 13 million cars and more soot than 1 million cars. Starting in 2015, cleaner fuel standards in the U.S. and Canada will reduce the amount of sulfur emitted by each ship about 97 percent and the amount of soot by 85 percent, in addition to the interim cleaner fuel standards already in place in North America.

Friends of the Earth's report card grades cruise lines on three criteria: sewage treatment technology; whether ships can plug into shore-based power and if they use cleaner fuel than required by U.S. and international law; and compliance with Alaska's water quality regulations to protect the state's coast.

Disney Cruise Line, based in Lake Buena Vista, Fla., was ranked as the most environmentally responsible line, earning an A for sewage treatment and an overall grade of A, the only line to score that highly and the first A ever issued to a cruise line. Keever said all four Disney ships have advanced sewage treatment systems and three are equipped to plug in to shore-based power.

At the other end of the scale, Carnival Cruise Lines of Doral, Fla. -- which has the world's largest fleet of 24 cruise ships but only two with advanced sewage treatment technology – received an F for sewage treatment and an overall grade of C-minus. Carnival Lines' parent company, Carnival Corp. & PLC of Miami and London, also operates six other lines graded by the report card. Although the Carnival-owned Seabourn and Cunard lines both received an A for sewage treatment and Holland America and Princess received a B and B-minus respectively, two other Carnival lines – P&O and Costa – received extremely low grades for sewage treatment and overall grades of F.

 

 

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Palm oil in cosmetics and other products risks environmental safety

[caption id="attachment_18980" align="alignleft" width="400"]Avon pledges "green" in palm oil use Avon pledges "green" in palm oil use[/caption]

If you are someone who likes cookies, crackers and cakes or you use cosmetics,  recent news details concerns that palm oil, a chief ingredient found in many of these products is produced in ways that are destructive to the environment.

Friends of the Earth has published news information related to palm oil planttions in Jakarta, Indonesia.    The article first points out that the claim of plantations as forest-friendly activity is incorrect,  when in fact these plantations are a large part of the problem of deforestation in Asia.  And the production of palm oil in these, and on similar plantations, is in large part responsible for the deforestation that negatively impacts climate change.

Palm oil is found in about half of all cosmetics and the foods mentioned, here along with others.  That's because it is relatively cheap to produce.  Friends of the Earth asks consumers to be aware of palm oil and reduce purchasing products with it, while at the same time exploring alternatives that are not destructive to the environment.

Environmentalists tell us to look for products that are certified as having sustainable palm oil.  These are referred to as CSPO and often can be found in packaging.

In the meantime, if you can't find a CSPO certified product, an organization out of Australia that advocates for orangutans, whose population is being decimated from deforestation, offers a list of products that can help you buy responsibly.   Another group that says we should say no to palm oil, offers a list of some of the products containing palm oil.

And for home baking, given the problems of palm oil with respect to temperature variations and other issues, the American Heart Association has this list of liquid butter alternatives.








Sunday, November 14, 2010

'Communist labeling' for environmental activism denounced by Friends ofthe Earth

GHN News Editor - Labeling
someone a Communist to detract from an opposition's criticisms or gains
occurs in many countries, as Friends of the Earth, an environmental
group points out, standing in solidarity with  anti-coal mining
activist,
Jean Marie Ferrais of the Philippines.

Friends

of the Earth President Erich Pica
http://foe.org/friends-earth-us-stands-solidarity-filipina-activist-jean-marie-ferraishas
issued a statement in support of Ferrais activities and standing with
her as she has denied recent allegations of being 'head of the
international financial cell' of the Communist Party.


“Friends of the Earth U.S. is outraged by recent allegations against
Filipina environmental activist Jean Marie Ferrais, team leader of the
Davao Regional Office of Legal Rights and National Resources Center/
Friends of the Earth Philippines," states the environmental group,
concerned about Ferais safety.


“Retired police director Rodolfo ‘Boogie’ Mendoza has falsely accused
Jean Marie Ferrais of being ‘head of the international financial cell’
of the Communist Party of the Philippines in Indonesia, which has been
designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the United States
government.


“Friends of the Earth U.S. stands in solidarity with Jean Marie Ferrais
and believes the allegations against her to be irresponsible, and to
endanger her safety. Furthermore, it’s troubling that members of the
Filipino police are equating anti-coal and anti-mining activities with
terrorism. Friends of the Earth calls for immediate measures to ensure
the safety  of Jean Marie Ferrais and for Filipino military and
government authorities to respect legitimate advocacy by civil society
members.”

These
are the tactics used in political arguments as well in the United
States, most notably involving Michelle Bachman, Representative to the
Congress from Minnesota, who referred to "many" people in the Congress
as "anti-American."
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/10/rep_michele_bachmann_tells_chr.htmlThe
rhetoric continues with alleged accusations of these same individuals
as "socialists," using the same comparisons as one would with
Communism.   The terms are often used to describe environmental
activisits as well.

The
epithets are often used to describe progressive actions agains the
interests of large corporations, as is the case in the Philippines.

Still,
given the problems the country has with communist insurrection in the
small island state, it is likely the concerns foment considerable worry,

thus the potential safety concerns expressed by Friends of the Earth

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Friends of the earth and Louisiana coastal residents at odds on future of oil

 

[caption id="attachment_11307" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="oil spill"][/caption]

WASHINGTON, D.C. --Editor- While the people who live on the Gulf Coast want to continue deepwater drilling, Friends of the Earth maintain it is important to look at the big picture and the root causes of the tragedy.

The following is the declaration made by the organization in response to what is being referred to as the oil spill bill   in a press release posted today:


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) this afternoon unveiled a
draft outline of a pared-down oil spill bill after officially abandoning
a broader attempt to address our climate and energy crises last week. 


“For a bill that was meant to respond to the consequences of our nation’s
crippling dependence on oil, it will not prevent oil disasters like the
one currently ravaging the Gulf Coast. This moment demanded aggressive
measures to end drilling and propel our country toward an oil-free future.


“The bill’s positive reforms include putting polluters like BP on the hook to pay the full costs of oil spill damage
and erecting a wall between revenue-takers and oil industry regulators
in the Department of the Interior. While the bill includes investments
in solutions like electric vehicles and energy efficient homes, they are
crumbs compared to the billions in taxpayer dollars that subsidize Big
Oil’s profits and pollution each year.


“Senators in bed with fossil fuel industry lobbyists have also hijacked this bill to
promote natural gas, a false solution. Natural gas extraction consumes
oil and is poisoning drinking water supplies from Texas to New York.


“The convergence of a favorable majority in Congress and the worst
environmental catastrophe in U.S. history presented a
once-in-a-generation opportunity to end our oil addiction.
Unfortunately, the Obama administration and Congress didn’t seize that
opportunity and future generations will suffer for it.


“In the absence of strong action from Congress, the Obama administration
must put a permanent moratorium on drilling and aggressively promote
policies to reduce oil consumption across the nation.”

In the meantime, people on the Gulf continue to ask the Obama
administration to end the moratorium on deepwater drilling and allow the
33 rigs not presently operating to continue.  While BP continues its
efforts to contain the oil spill that began on April 21 from the
Deepwater Horizon rig explosion, folks are concerned that the loss of
income from drilling for oil will have a devastating impact on the 
economic welfare of coastal residents.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Friends of the earth ask for end to big oil's influence in politics

Republicans accuse President Barack Obama of getting campaign cash  from Big Oil, but it turns out Obama isn't near the top of the list but his former rival, John McCain is, as environmentalists ask for end to Big Oil's influence in Washington.

.Open Secrets.org gives the details on where the money goes, and Friends of the Earth has made a list to let us know which politicians have the most oily hands.  At the same time, this organization joins others in asking that undue influence of Big Oil in Washington come to an end.


On the state level, Big Oil has figured big in Louisiana politics, with Governor Bobby Jindal the largest recipient of its largesse, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.  Jindal, as Governor of Louisiana, has received more money than the President of the United States when Jindal ran for office in 2007.

“We all know money talks, and in the last two election cycles alone, the oil and gas industries spent $48,401,891 to curry influence in Washington. Congress has been corrupted by this dirty money,” said Friends of the Earth’s president, Erich Pica. “This corruption has inhibited the transition to clean energy and produced the dangerous drilling policies that led to the disaster in the Gulf. Each and every member of Congress who has accepted this tainted money is part of the problem. All elected officials who have taken oil money should turn it over to organizations doing recovery work in the Gulf.”

“Corporate influence in Washington has become so overwhelming that the ability of our government to function in the public interest is now in question,” Pica added. “Members of Congress need to make clear whether they think they’re representatives in an oil-igarchy or a democracy. If they are committed to democracy, they must give this money back, stop doing corporate polluters’ bidding and start acting in the public interest.”


Friends of the earth said that the organization's campaign to end Big Oil's influence in Washington applies to all members of Congress who have taken oil money, but the focus is specifically on the top five House and top five Senate members who have taken the most money from BP in the last few years.


Friends of the Earth now asks these politicans to contribute the money they received to the Gulf Coast Fund to help the region most impacted by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  Senator John McCain of Arizona ranks at #1 in receipt of money from Big Oil:’


The “BP Ten” are:


Senate

·         John McCain (R-AZ, $36,649 from BP and $2,428,287 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Mary Landrieu (D-LA, $16,200 from BP and $329,100 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Mark Begich (D-AK, $8,550 from BP and $85,958 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Lisa Murkowski (R-AK, $8,500 from BP and $223,326 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Mitch McConnell (R-KY, $8,500 from BP and $408,400 from Big Oil since 2006)


House

·         John Culberson (R-TX, $10,200 from BP and $187,350 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Ron Paul (R-TX, $7,300 from BP and $134,132 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Charles Rangel (D-NY, $6,500 from BP and $40,600 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Steny Hoyer (D-MD, $6,000 from BP and $91,800 from Big Oil since 2006)

·         Don Young (R-AK, $5,500 from BP and $45,500 from Big Oil since 2006)