Showing posts with label emotional problems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emotional problems. Show all posts

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Learn the issues of Narcissistic Personality Disorder in the DSM V

Sam Vaknin — The DSM V re-defines personality disorders thus: The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits.

According to the June 2011 text of the DSM V, the following criteria must be met to diagnose Narcissistic Personality Disorder (in parentheses my comments):

Significant impairments in personality functioning in either identity, or self-direction (should be: in both.)

Identity

The narcissist keeps referring to others excessively in order to regulate his self-esteem (really, sense of self-worth) and for “self-definition” (to define his identity.) His self-appraisal is exaggerated, whether it is inflated, deflated, or fluctuating between these two poles and his emotional regulation reflects these vacillations. (Finally, the DSM V accepted what I have been saying for decades: that narcissists can have an “inferiority complex” and feel worthless and bad; that they go through cycles of ups and downs in their self-evaluation; and that this cycling influences their mood and affect.)

Self-direction

The narcissist sets goals in order to gain approval from others (narcissistic supply; the DSM V ignores the fact that the narcissist finds disapproval equally rewarding as long as it places him firmly in the limelight.) The narcissist lacks self-awareness as far as his motivation goes (and as far as everything else besides.)

The narcissist's personal standards and benchmarks are either too high (which supports his grandiosity), or too low (buttresses his sense of entitlement, which is incommensurate with his real-life performance.)

Impairments in interpersonal functioning in either empathy or intimacy (should be: in both.)

Empathy

The narcissist finds it difficult to identify with the emotions and needs of others, but is very attuned to their reactions when they are relevant to himself (cold empathy.) Consequently, he overestimates the effect he has on others or underestimates it (the classic narcissist never underestimates the effect he has on others – but the inverted narcissist does.)

Intimacy

The narcissist's relationships are self-serving and, therefore shallow and superficial. They are centered around and geared at the regulation of his self-esteem (obtaining narcissistic supply for the regulation of his labile sense of self-worth.)

The narcissist is not “genuinely” interested in his intimate partner's experiences (implying that he does fake such interest convincingly.) The narcissist emphasizes his need for personal gain (by using the word “need”, the DSM V acknowledges the compulsive and addictive nature of narcissistic supply). These twin fixtures of the narcissist's relationships render them one-sided: no mutuality or reciprocity (no intimacy).

Pathological personality traits

Antagonism characterized by grandiosity and attention-seeking…

Grandiosity

The aforementioned feeling of entitlement. The DSM V adds that it can be either overt or covert (which corresponds to my taxonomy of classic and inverted narcissist.)

Grandiosity is characterized by self-centeredness; a firmly-held conviction of superiority (arrogance or haughtiness); and condescending or patronizing attitudes.

Attention-seeking

The narcissist puts inordinate effort, time, and resources into attracting others (sources of narcissistic supply) and placing himself at the focus and centre of attention. He seeks admiration (the DSM V gets it completely wrong here: the narcissist does prefer to be admired and adulated, but, failing that, any kind of attention would do, even if it is negative.)

The diagnostic criteria end with disclaimers and differential diagnoses, which reflect years of accumulated research and newly-gained knowledge:

The above enumerated impairments should be “stable across time and consistent across situations ... not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment ... are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).”

Abolish Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) in DSM V? – Click HERE to Watch the Video

DSM V proposed diagnostic criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder available HERE.

Read more about the shortcomings of the DSM IV and how they are tackled in the DSM V – click HERE.

Bibliography

Goldman, Howard H., Review of General Psychiatry, fourth edition,1995. Prentice-HallInternational, London.

Gelder, Michael, Gath, Dennis, Mayou, Richard, Cowen, Philip (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry, third edition, 1996, reprinted 2000. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Vaknin, Sam, Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited, eighth revised impression, 1999-2006. Narcissus Publications, Prague and Skopje.

Westen, Drew et al. Refining the Construct of Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Diagnostic Criteria and Subtypes (Posted at http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/pap.dtl)



About the Author

Sam Vaknin (http://samvak.tripod.com) is the author of Malignant Self-Love: Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain – How the West Lost the East, as well as many other books and ebooks about topics in psychology, relationships, philosophy, economics, and international affairs. He is the Editor-in-Chief of Global Politician and served as a columnist for Central Europe Review, PopMatters, eBookWeb, and Bellaonline, and as a United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent. He was the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in The Open Directory and Suite101. Visit Sam’s Web site at http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com. 

Depression risk in working mothers vs stay-at-home moms

Tom Clark — People suffering from depression often feel anxious, sad, and hopeless. Depression can be most devastating for mothers of young children.

[caption id="attachment_16648" align="alignright" width="300"] Virginia Woolf - renowned author with severe depression[/caption]

In extreme cases, sufferers may experience fatigue, lethargy, loss of appetite, overeating, irritability, and deteriorating health. Mothers of young children that need to earn an income face difficult choices with respect to finding and keeping employment. These decisions include solving the problem of reliable childcare and how to pay for it. The stresses generated by dealing with these issues can lead to depression in working mothers because of worries about lost time with their children and concerns over managing a career.

Stay-at-home mothers do not necessarily fare any better. Therapists and social workers advise us that remaining at home all of the time can lead to isolation and social disconnection which can have the effect of increasing the risk for maternal depression in certain people. The importance of the matter has as much to do with the well-being of our young children as their mothers because maternal depression by itself creates health risks for these children.

Depression risk depends upon preferences and job quality

What is important for us to know is not which is better, working or staying at home, but rather what the actual, root causes of maternal depression are. As it turns out, the answers that we are looking for emerge when we analyze the expectations and preferences of the subjects, as well as the job quality of those subjects who choose to work. Studies have shown that mothers who stay home because they prefer it exhibit a measurably lower risk of depression. In contrast, stay-at-home moms who would prefer to be out working, but can’t, are more likely to be subject to higher risks of feeling depressed. Further research indicates that these mothers are at the same risk of depression as those subjects that would rather stay home with their children but are not able to because they need to work, or because they work at what they consider to be low-quality jobs.

It seems that employment by itself is neither good nor bad for women with children as it relates to depression. A lot depends on the kind of jobs the subjects in these studies find. Working mothers with low-quality jobs are at the greatest risk of depression in this study even if they really want to work. On the other hand, statistics show that mothers that hold down high-quality jobs (as they see it), face a substantially lower risk of maternal depression even if their preference was to not work at all.

The takeaways are clear: High-quality jobs are associated with lower numbers of working mothers showing symptoms of depression. The opposite is true for mothers in lower-quality jobs that would prefer to work. Relatively high levels of depressive symptoms were revealed in stay-at-home mothers who want to work outside the home but don't. These outcomes were comparable with subjects employed in what they considered low-quality jobs. Overall, mothers with the least risk of depression were those who preferred to work outside of the home at what they considered a high-quality job.