Showing posts with label liberal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberal. Show all posts

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Recalling a pilgrimage to Dr. King's Atlanta home and the lessons of the day

[caption id="attachment_22440" align="alignleft" width="296"]Dr. Martin Luther King Dr. Martin Luther King[/caption]

Carol Forsloff----It was a long day in Atlanta, warm, sunny, and a stopover on the way to Florida from Pittsburgh at a time when the country had moved on from the angry shouts and hurts that emanated from the Civil Rights era, and those wounds felt by so many, to another time, eight years after the death of Martin Luther King in 1968, and a pilgrimage to the memorials.  The memories remain, in reflection, along with life's lessons that stay in the heart as his birthday is tomorrow.

Atlanta was not in my traveling plans, but a missed plane left me stranded in a strange city with no sense of direction, unable to drive and without a car in a place I had never been and only read about.  Those things associated with the city of Atlanta had been the civil rights demonstrations and marches, the acrimony shown on television between blacks and whites and the still older images of the burning of the city during the Civil War.  It was not a positive mindset, held by a woman of the West of liberal leanings; and the first thought was to remain at the airport and simply read a book I had tucked in a travel bag for those occasions of boredom when traveling some distance from Pittsburgh, where I had been living for years.

But a venture out on the curb outside the airport terminal and a look around, emboldened me enough to flag a cab driver who happened to be driving along.  I knew Martin Luther King had lived and was buried in the city, so the plan was to go to the memorial, expecting to be one of a minority of white people interested in visiting the former civil rights leader's grave.

When I told the cabdriver of my plans he replied, "Well, this is my taxi; and I have never been to those places myself.  Why don't I show you the town, if you don't mind my picking up other fares along the way so I don't lose all the income for the day." The agreement was made, as funds were limited anyway by the unexpected time and cost of staying for hours in Atlanta, and a welcome invitation for sure.

We drove through the town through neighborhoods of plain, simple houses, of the kind where I had lived and other middle class friends did as well.  Along the way the cabdriver stopped for a man in a fine suit, who politely offered hello, took a seat, as we shared the ride to the home where Martin Luther King had once lived and the home still a residence for his family in 1976, long after his death in 1967.  The man in the suit offered his card, long lost and forgotten, with a name not recalled anymore, but said, with the card, "I am Sammy Davis Jr's agent, and I too have never been to the home of Dr. King.  I met him many times but have never been to the place where he lived." He seemed surprised I was going there too.

The conversations among us, the cabdriver, originally from the Middle East, a middle-aged African man and me were part of the day's good memories of how strangers meet and in a journey learn and grow with the time.  For each of us visiting King's home and his gravesite came with a different response, but similar too, with respect for the man who had dedicated his life to the freedom of man, black and white.

The house was modest, and not one folks might associate with a man of such incredible reputation, talent and moral strength.  Yet there it was, the downstairs portion dedicated to an office and library collection of civil rights books and memorabilia, while the upstairs, the secretary said, continued to be the family home.  I asked, "Mostly black people come here to visit or people from up North like me?"  "Oh no," said the woman, a smile on her face, "Actually most of the people who visit here and the grave, as well as Ebenezer Baptist Church are white Southerners."  The stereotype of angry white people assaulting black folks with rocks, hoses and epithets dissolved in that comment, to teach me that the news doesn't always present all the facts, but the sensational ones get more attention instead.  We three stood there, listened and wandered a bit through the small area, then left to visit the grave.

Davis' agent was the first to make his way to the gravesite, standing silently and saying aloud, "How I miss you, my brother," as tears began drifting down the cheek of a man who obviously knew Dr. King.  The taxi driver also stood in respect, saying nothing, but his eyes full of wonderment still.  And I feeling privileged just to be there to honor, remember the man I had only seen on television and celebrated just in my heart, knelt for a minute and prayed.

We returned to the cab, somewhat moved at the time, exclaiming, but softly, the feelings that all of us shared.  We three seemed to know we had been somewhere significant and expressed it with joy in our words, as the passenger, who had shared the journey, was left at his hotel, smiling and waving like a friend saying farewell to another on a day that was special to both.

What I learned on that day that has lasted for years is that strangers can share intimate moments of feelings, as had happened that day, especially when surrendering preconceived notions as well.  I wasn't a white woman from Pittsburgh, the cabdriver not a Middle Eastern immigrant and the man who had introduced himself as Sammy Davis Jr's agent was just another person that day, remembering to honor a friend and knowing that friend's greatness as well.  We were three people each on a pilgrimage of sorts to pay respects to the great man martyred for his work and beliefs.

 

 

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Why the South stays "Red"

image

If you live in the south or travel much through it you will notice most motels carry one televlsion for much of its news, a conclusion based on anecdotal evidence but meaningful all the same.

At a Super 8 outside of Dallas the question was asked why the channel is on Fox News.  The desk clerk said at one time it was on CNN, but people claimed the channel too liberal.

"Had anyone complained about Fox?" he was asked.  The clerk said no one had because it was the channel that is fair and balanced.

But many shows are hosted by politicians, was the counter.  "Well they are better than the media."he replied.

Most of the South is politically red which may account for these observations and why they will likely remain.

Posted from WordPress for Android

The collapse of the political left in Europe

[caption id="attachment_4554" align="alignnone" width="209" caption="British Labour Party leader Ed Miliband, 2010"][/caption]

Michael Cosgrove - Britain is still coming to terms with the poor showing of the Labour Party in recent local and regional elections, but the left is doing badly all over Europe. Why is this happening? The answer comes in one word – ‘immigration.’

Britain’s coalition government consisting of the Conservative Party and Liberal Democrats is the result of the 2010 general election, which saw the Labour Party ousted from power after many long years at the helm. The current government has proved to be an unhappy marriage however and the many disagreements within its ranks have been exploited with glee by the left, which was naturally expecting good results from the local and regional elections. Alas, that optimism proved to be misplaced.

On a national level, these results can be explained by the loss of crucial Labour support groups such as working-class voters and the very Liberals who chose to govern with the Conservatives instead of going into opposition with Labour. Looked at from a European standpoint however, what has happened to Labour is symptomatic of what has been happening everywhere else too.

The facts speak for themselves. France’s Socialist Party presidential candidates have been roundly trounced ever since Mitterand left power in 1995 and there hasn’t been a Socialist government for many years either. Socialists polled only 16% in recent European elections and Italy’s Democrats didn’t fare much better, with only 26%. Dutch right-wing firebrand Geert Wilders has become a power-broker in Holland and election results in Austria, Sweden and elsewhere have given scant comfort to the left. The left also suffered heavy losses in recent elections in Finland. At the same time a rise in fortunes of right and even extreme right-wing politicians and parties is to be seen all over the continent.

As in Britain, the various European Socialist parties have been losing crucial working and lower middle class support to the right, despite the financial crisis, which, as it hit lower income groups hard, should have given them and their “tax the rich and the banks” approach to solving the problem a boost. So what is going wrong?

Most European countries have in common that immigration has become a major issue. Rightly or wrongly, many Europeans consider that there are so many immigrants in their countries that their national identities are being destroyed. This sentiment was exacerbated by 9/11 because Europe – and France in particular – has millions of Muslim immigrants, not all of which are here legally.

The public is no longer prepared to see a cash-strapped left-inspired welfare state system hand out money to immigrants while poor Europeans are suffering financial hardship, and those who pay tax are fed up with being forced, as they see it, to subsidize immigrants who have no hope of getting a job in what is already an extremely difficult labor market beset by high unemployment.

The result is that concepts dear to the left such as multiculturalism and ethnic diversity have been openly declared to be “a failure” by both British Prime Minister David Cameron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel – that which would have been unthinkable ten years ago - and much of public opinion agrees, saying that those concepts have failed to the point where they have been responsible for the failure to integrate immigrant communities.

Current events such as the flood of refugees beaching in Italy after having risked their lives crossing the Mediterranean Sea from conflict-ridden Libya and Tunisia have not increased sympathy for immigrants and the left seems powerless to suggest policies to counter them. Should Europe integrate them or give them temporary asylum? The left is silent. The right however is surfing on the anti-immigrant wave to demand that Europe introduces emergency legislation to increase border surveillance and that the refugees be returned immediately to Africa.

Can the European left do anything to improve its fortunes? It would be premature to write Socialism off altogether, but turning things around would require a fundamental reinventing of what Socialism means today. As it stands it does not offer a credible working alternative to free-market capitalism, despite the system’s failings. This will need leaders of vision who have the courage to steer the left into previously uncharted waters.

Also, developing and proposing serious and credible alternatives to its current policy of accepting whoever turns up on Europe’s doorstep is also essential, however unpalatable doing so may seem.

In other words, the left in Europe must inject a little more realism into its idealism because failure to do so will lead to its decline and eventual demise. It’s that simple, and it’s that difficult too.