Showing posts with label Internet research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet research. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Social media platforms foretell the future through examination of worldwide events

Facebook
Communication device for social media contacts

Editor--Can we tell the future by watching and reading Facebook or Twitter? Some folks believe we can and that in doing so we can create better avenues for dealing with problems by knowing each other, our wants and needs better.  But how does this happen?

Facebook, Twitter and other social media channels tend to record our moves, our likes and dislikes and our online behavior.  Internet research tells us that social media is a tool to help better comprehend and anticipate human behavior.

"It is undeniable that social media (provides) an extremely rich source of information, and it makes sense to exploit that data to make predictions or forecast future trends of offline phenomena," says Daniel Gayo-Avello, who is among the guest editors for the current issue of Internet Research.  "There are also measurable differences in the way that credible and non-credible (social media) messages spread. Special measures can be used to filter out those messages that are not trustworthy."

Gayo-Avello goes on to say that statistical methods combined with social media data can help build predictions models.says the studies also suggest that using statistical methods, in which external (but scarce) data is combined with social media data to build a predictive model, can be a promising approach.

"Up to now, a number of different scenarios-such as (those related to) the economy, politics, health or event detection-have been studied with varied results. For instance, prediction of flu and other epidemic outbreaks seem to be reasonably predictable on the basis of user-generated content," says Gayo-Avello. "Social media can be used to at least predict the present. It can be used as a proxy measure for variables that cannot be measured in real time on a general basis, such as unemployment rates or public opinions on a number of issues."

 Bill Balderaz, president of Fathom Columbus,  notes his company uses social media to predict certain outcomes, including the most recent presidential elections.  They correctly predicted who would win.

"Social media is the largest, fastest and most uninhibited focus group ever created. (The Internet Research studies) demonstrate that knowing how consumers feel is a predictor of how they will behave," says Balderaz, who's confident his firm can accurately predict everything from stock prices to climate change based on social media conversations.

"It's not as hard as you would think," says Balderaz. "We use historical data correlations to predict the future. We analyze social media patterns going back years, then we correlate social media conversations with real events."

So it is possible to predict the future using trends on social media.  So while participants wonder how their personal information and habits are used, perhaps some of it will end up with good intentions, like predicting an epidemic enough in advance that people can get medicines and help in time.

Monday, July 26, 2010

College students not so smart at Internet research

 

[caption id="attachment_11461" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Google"][/caption]

 Carol Forsloff - Fighting for top positions in Google might work out for businesses who work hard to get
there, but is that the way knowledge should be driven, given that many students
rely on the first few pages for their information?





It is a reasonable question since Google position is driven not by substance but
by certain search engine optimization tools and rules as well as popularity of
the page itself, which could simply be a cute video of someone getting ready
for work in the morning.


Young
people give Google, other top brand search results too much credibility.  Researchers say they aren’t as savvy as folks
think.


Northwestern
University did a study of how many students do their research and found that
many students only click on websites that are actually at the top of Google
searches.  They also search for other
brand-name websites and searches.


The study
was published by the International Journal of Communication.


"Many
students think, ‘Google placed it number one, so, of course it's
credible,'" said Eszter Hargittai,
associate professor of communication studies at Northwestern. "This is
potentially tricky because Google doesn't rank a site by its credibility."


 102 students at the University of Illinois at
Chicago were party of the study and sat at computers with researchers.  Each student was asked to bring up the web
page they used to start browsing the Internet.
Their responses were captured on video as researchers gave students a
variety of information to research.
Google came up the most dominant research tool.


Previous
university research also shows students use Wikipedia for preliminary research,
although they may substantiate what they find by using other material as well.


What
was particular interesting was that students often didn’t even know the website
before they began funneling the information into some documentable form.


"Search
engine rankings seem extremely important," Hargittai said. “We found that
a website’s layout or content almost didn’t even matter to the students. What
mattered is that it was the number one result on Google."


Aside
from Google, other online brands that students mentioned most often to complete
tasks were: Yahoo!, SparkNotes, MapQuest, Microsoft, Wikipedia, AOL and Facebook.


Some
of the students did give more credibility to websites ending in dot-gov,
dot-edu or dot-org.


Hargittai
said most didn't know dot-org domain names could be registered by anyone, and


thus are not inherently different from dot-com sites.