Showing posts with label medias purpose. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medias purpose. Show all posts

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Is media a way to cope, escape, be informed or none of these

Thomas Jefferson saw the press to inform, educate and hold power to account
 If your world is bleak, you are likely not to want to hear about other people's problems in great numbers, especially if their crisis is yours, according to research.  So what is news for people: a way to escape, cope or be informed?

Or is it just an exercise to claim your rights as a citizen in a democracy, reading how people express themselves, on what and how so that you can respond as well in comments that agree or sizzle with fiery discontent.

For the latter is how it seems, many people say.  Although some have examined the issue more closely through research on reading patterns.


These days everyone has an opinion about the news, it seems.  The political arguments are enticing at times, but at the same time people of all stripes seem to say they are tired of it too.

According to the research people use the media either to cope or to escape, depending on the problem.

A bad love affair is usually seen by most people as a major crisis in their lives. For that reason they may not be interested in reading informational articles about bad love affairs. On the other hand, financial difficulties are less personal in nature; and people often reach for information on to learn how to cope with them.

Results of a  study showed that emotionally -charged problems are the kind many people avoid reading about in the media if they are experiencing similar problems. But those difficulties that carry less emotion, as such as those financial problems, don't create the same responses and therefore people are more apt to want to learn how to cope with the difficulties.

Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick, co-author of the study and associate professor of communication at Ohio State University, says, “People want to avoid reading about topics that may bring up unpleasant thoughts and emotions. But people seek out information that may help them find solutions for less personal problems.”

The study was conducted in Germany and the results are now in the journal of Communication Research. It involved 287 German college students where they took life satisfaction questionnaires and five areas that included health, finances, friendship, college and career and romantic relationships. In the second separate study they were asked to evaluate online news and magazine articles which corresponded to the five subject areas they were questioned about earlier.


Students were advised they wouldn't have enough time to read all the articles and to concentrate on those in which they had the most interest. The results of the study showed that people’s satisfaction levels in the life areas influenced what they read about. This substantiated the notion that some people will read or listen to news or information to escape while others will read to cope, depending upon the emotionality of the issue.

Those who write crimes news recognize how popular they are. Indeed many reporters want to cover crime stories for that reason, because they have enduring appeal. Why is that? Linda Heath, a university psychologist, answers the question following her research where she analyzed crime content in 36 newspapers and subsequently analyzed attitudes about crime in interviews. She learned that people enjoy reading about crime more for just the thrill. This is what she says:
"The more newspapers print articles about criminals in other places running amok, picking victims at random, and trampling social norms, the more secure readers feel in their own environments. In essence, readers like the grass to be browner on the other side of the fence, and the browner the better. Far from frightening, reports of grisly, bizarre crimes in other cities are reassuring. Readers are still exposed to some reports of crime that occur locally, but the severity and outrageous nature of such crimes appear to be judged in comparison to one's own life.
Crime is one of those areas of interest that allows people to escape as opposed to cope. Crime stories are often written in New England one wonders why that is. According to publisher Kate Flora in New England people experience long winters. So people there are trapped in close quarters together, which Flora says “can lead to dark, mischievous thoughts. “ Research reveals people use all forms of media for their own purposes. It is more likely than not that certain types of reading material or television news is enjoyed simply because it tells people their own lives may not be so bad after all while others find information they need to make their lives better.

These days many people get their news online.  And what online writers and editors have found is that many people will only scroll through half of an article.  They may read bits and pieces throughout the article, but ordinarily won't finish it, even when it is of special importance for the information contained within it.

And, sadly enough, the Pew Forum found that most people are not influenced that much by current news and information with respect to their knowledge of current affairs.

So when we talk about why people listen or read the news, we must recognize that each person finds his or her own measure of interest satisfied by it.

It seems the answer to the question about the media is that people use it in bits and pieces for coping, escaping or being informed and much too often none of the above and rather simply to reinforce pre-existing ideas.


Sunday, September 26, 2010

Wall Street's motto greed is good challenges media's purpose

Carol Forsloff - If
you have a little money and 15 social media friends willing to Facebook
and Twitter for you or have a strong political agenda and know people
with bucks, you can post news, but how does that aid its real purpose?


There
is a march to get in line to write news, now that it has been found
that most Americans get much of their news from the Internet.  Some of
this "news" is in the form of email messages with snippets of
information that give no author and no source and yet are quoted
regularly.  Some are videos pasted on Facebook.  But that's not the
biggest dilemma we face.


There
are corporate backers with mighty bucks to back sites
over the  Internet.  They have the money to pay for agenda writing, far
more than places where traditionally trained journalists often post
news.  That's one form of media driven by Wall Street ways on the web.
Yet there are those designed to empower citizens by mocking or copying
traditional news sources, by design, in order to secure attention and
control all at the same time.


These
days anyone can write the news, so citizen sites announce.  But what
does that do for the fourth estate, the organism originally empowered to
inform, educate and really hold power to account when just anyone with a
computer or corporate financial backing can control what you read and
observe?


The
news you get may not be the news you need, want or ought to have, given
the sources available, some with the incredible and some lacking
credibility at all.  While folks condemn the traditional media, a whole
new wing, much of it to the right, has sprung up to write "the news,"
some under the banner of Jesus and some under the banner of right-wing
persuasion or both.


There
is also citizen journalism, originally designed to supplement
information from "on the ground" sources, which strives these days to
compete with traditional news sources.  Some of these "journalists,"
referred to as "citizen reporters" or "digital journalists" often have
no journalism training at all and could have been your plumber yesterday
or even your babysitter tomorrow.  On some citizen sites, it is
possible to write news that is presented in an attractive format by
someone who has never investigated directly most of the material
written.  It is also often presented by those without background in the
topic being written about, whether that's history, science, politics,
social sciences or even local information from the geographic area
itself.


All
of this adds up to the corporate design becoming the engine of media
news, not just television and traditional sources, but also the World
Wide Web.  These organizations have sufficient time, assets or both to
form a mighty bulwark of opposition to journalists who try to report the
news in unbiased, unvarnished ways.  Traditional journalists who join
are driven out, either through opposition to copied news or methods of
business promotion.  Popularity with voting mechanisms as opposed to
quality drives what is read and what is not.


While
the state of the media shows citizen journalism growing, the concept of
posting material over which there is limited editorial input or control
remains a question not just of traditional but citizen journalists as
well.


Some
say the way to reduce the problem is for readers to avoid blogs
entirely.  Yet in the present growth of the media, traditional
journalists turn more and more to blogs to write the news, because of
the ease of posting, while many bloggers continue to write mostly
opinion.  So it's not the form of delivery, but who delivers the
message, that makes the difference these days.


Traditional
news sites, on the other hand, respond to citizen journalism and the
public's interest in direct involvement by comment sections that
sometimes take over the site.  These too are directed towards the
popular and the mundane as opposed to serious information and ideas,
because the notion of control, of power and of greed controls the game.


So
what are the consequences in the Wall Street world of the web?  The
public is left with confusion and less trust in the information
produced.  Without safeguards, the media has moved away from
information, education and holding power to account.  It is now a puzzle
to sort through, a mass of mistakes and agendas people have to sort to
find what they need for sound living and to make good decisions in a


free society.