Is quality education still a privilege?

[caption id="attachment_5825" align="alignleft" width="300"] Some get tech training, as costs escalate[/caption]

Mike Gordon---Society generally feels it improves as time passes. Education is one aspect that has seen many developments over the years. Yet, there are concerns in the public about quality education still being available only to the privileged few. Are there some students that receive a better education because of their race, gender or ethnicity?

Is meritocracy a hopeful dream or a reality of how the education system works? Countless factors are associated with these questions. Below, we’ll take a look at education and if there really is an issue related to race, gender and/or ethnicity, leading the system to favor one over the other.

Financial Struggle

Many impoverished areas of the U.S. have experienced a general disregard for education. Fingers are often pointed past issues related to race, gender and poverty and toward the local government. Many governments are busy handling issues related to the financial books instead of the education system. Since attention is diverted, quality education is pushed down the list of priorities and tends to remain there. As the system starts to fail, challenges related to education become more and more apparent; citizens begin to focus more on surviving the present than on investing in their future.

The financial struggle is a significant factor: experts note that “nearly 60,000 or three-quarters of the nation’s schools reported not being in good condition.” Many schools are in disrepair, and resources are not being funneled in their direction. There is a case to be made in terms of quality education not being standard across the nation. Various schools around the country are simply not providing adequately for their students. This is unfortunate and continues to impeach the belief that high-quality education is accessible by all.

Meritocracy Not Given Importance

When students are tested in the nation for reading and writing aptitude, many from the States top the charts. This is a bright sign, but the general trend paints a different picture. Despite these students being highly gifted, most are unable to progress toward a brighter future. The train stops in its tracks as poverty kicks in for some states.

Low-income families are unable to produce the funds required to enroll their kids in post-secondary education. There are various grants and funds in place to help these children, but the results are not sufficient: often children from low-income schools have too much academic ground to make up to be successful even if they are lucky enough to enroll in college. The government should be acting to standardize the quality of education being provided to children around the nation. Minorities continue to struggle to get into college, and struggle further to succeed, because of a host of factors beyond their control.

Impoverished Areas Lack Diversity

Many poor areas are comprised of mostly African Americans. Government officials will quickly assert that this is a coincidence and not something done with intent. However, the data is undeniable: most poverty-stricken areas contain African Americans as the main race. These individuals are further pushed into the corner as funds continue to be cut off or reduced in favor of other areas. There are a lot of questions to be answered in order to achieve quality education as an equal opportunity for one and all.

For the public school system to really work, the quality of education must be sufficient across the board. If the resources don’t exist to provide equal opportunity and access to education across our country, then drastic steps should be taken to make it so.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This article was provided by Mike Gordon, recent business school graduate and budding social trends analyst. 

Private school vouchers not found educationally effective

Carol Forsloff - "BAEO
applauds and supports key tenets of the President's education reform
platform, especially his emphasis on turning around failing schools and
increasing the number of high-quality charter schools. However, his
stance on parental choice is wrong. "



With these remarks, Kevin
Chavous, President of the Black Alliance for Educational Options,  is
asking President Obama to continue school choice in Washington D.C.,  a
concept Chavous declares is working, in spite of the present concerns
about favoritism and not allowing all children the same access to
education.  How this is to be done is being debated, as it has been for
years, especially since civil rights legislation integrating public
schools.

Private school vouchers were advocated during the time of integration by white Southerners to avoid children having to go to racially mixed schools.  The buzz word for this became "quality education" and was eventually adopted by many conservatives, like Barry Goldwater who ran for President in part on the platform of educational choice.  The idea in present times has been embraced by some African American groups in order to secure better education for their children through scholarship opportunities.

The school voucher program is advocated by the Black
Alliance for Educational options, in spite of being questioned by
educational experts and government advisers.  Chavous, howwever,
continues to explain his group's reasons for maintaining the program.

 "President Obama spoke on NBC's Today Show September 27,
and said disadvantaged families without "a bunch of connections…should
be getting the same quality education for their kids as anybody else, "
explains Chavous.   "Yet his administration has acted to end what some
consider a highly successful Opportunity Scholarship Program in
Washington D.C.  The program provides vouchers to poor children so they
can opt out of failing schools to attend quality alternatives."

Chavou
maintains that Obama is contradicting his policies of equal opportunity
through the administration's target of the opportunity program.

Writing on behalf www.RevolutionInEducation.orgof
Black families and educators nationwide, Chavous suggests the
contradiction is the height of hypocrisy.  He is asking that the President
reverse his opposition to publicly funded school vouchers and allow
low-income children access to the same quality education he and his
children have enjoyed.

"As a beneficiary of a privately funded scholarship, you attended the most elite private school in Hawaii,"
Chavous writes. "You and Mrs. Obama have also chosen a private school
for your own children. Because there are not enough private scholarships
to serve all low-income families, you more than anyone should be an
advocate for government-funded opportunity scholarships nationwide."

Chavous
and the Black Alliance for Educational Options http://www.baeo.org/are
calling for President Obama to announce his support for to maintain the
D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, and embrace private school choice
for low-income families nationwide.

 We cannot continue
to ask parents to wait and hold out hope that reforms will eventually
succeed for their children," writes Chavous.  "The ability to choose a
high-quality school is critically important and should be extended to
all parents, regardless of income. As Dr. Martin Luther King
said during the civil rights movement, we need to act with the fierce
urgency of now. Our young people cannot wait. Opportunity scholarships
help educate children today."

Chavous said, in
reference to Obama, "He's talking the talk," said Chavous, "and
believing he's philosophically on our side, we're strongly urging him to
walk the walk."that BAEO was motivated to purchase the national
advertisement—and launch its new "Revolution in Education" campaign—when
President Obama himself pointed to the uneven playing field in the
District's schools.

But has the Opportunity Scholarship Program worked, as Chavous has claimed?


The
DC School Choice Incentive Act of 2003 was the first federally funded
private school voucher program in the United States.  It provided
scholarships of up to $7,500 for D.C. low income residents to send their
children to participating private schools.  Built into the Act was an
assessment program so that the success of it could be established and
tracked.

An independent
study as called for in the DC School Choice Incentive Act found the
following "key findings" in the third year report:

• "No
  evidence of a statistically significant difference in test scores
  between students who were offered an OSP scholarship and students who
  were not offered a scholarship.


• The program had a consistently positive impact on parent satisfaction and their perceptions of school safety.


• Students
  who were offered OSP scholarships did not report being more satisfied
  with school or feeling safer in school than those without access to
  scholarships.


• This same pattern of findings holds when the
  analysis is conducted to determine the impact of using a scholarship
  rather than being offered a scholarship, taking into account the
  approximately 20 percent of students who were offered but chose not to
  use their scholarships the first year."