Saturday, November 13, 2010

Supreme Court scheduled to issue landmark decision on whether U.S.Constitution valid

ATLANTA,   --PRN - USN - GHN News Editor - Is the United States Supreme Court
prepared to stop the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia from functioning like common criminals?"  This question is being asked by a retired Atlanta grandfather who asks the Supreme Court if the Constitution is valid.


The whole thing may sound unusual, but this is a serious case with three petitions filed by William M. Windsor. A decision is to be given by year's end.  If the  Supreme Court  doesn't acts, federal judges will be free to void the Constitution.


These are the questions being presented to the Supreme Court by Windsor:


  1. Will The Supreme Court declare that the Constitution and its amendments may be voided by federal judges?

  2. Should federal judges be stopped from committing illegal and corrupt acts to obstruct justice and inflict bias on litigants?  

  3. Will The Supreme Court be afraid to disclose the corruption in the federal courts?

The case has been going through the federal courts through legal action filed by Windsor since 2006.  He is doing this to refute a lawsuit against him in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls swore under oath that Windsor was guilty of theft and bribery, along with other crimes.  Windsor states under oath that Glynn made it all up and lied about everything.  He obtained  deposition testimony
from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride in
Niagara Falls, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against
Windsor were not true.



Even though he was not found guilty, and there was clear proof of that,  federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit.  He was subsequently forced to pay $400,000
in legal fees.  Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay
rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the
U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of
their consideration (cert denied).



Windsor believes that the federal courts and nine federal judges
violated the Constitution, the Due Process Clause, and the First,
Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the
Constitution.



Windsor says: "I have discovered that, at least in Atlanta, Georgia,
the federal courts operate like a police state in which the judges are
all-powerful, committing criminal acts from their benches and violating
the Constitutional rights of parties who have the misfortune of
appearing in their courts."



As presented in a press release regarding this case, Windsor has now tossed the hot potato right square in the laps of the justices of the Supreme Court.  By filing mandamus petitions rather than an appeal, The Supreme Court
is forced to deal with Windsor's allegations of corruption in the
federal courts.



Grandfather Windsor hopes for the best but fears for the worst: "I hope
The Supreme Court is decent, honest, and cares about the Constitution
and the citizens of the United States.  However, I am
sorry to say that at this point, I suspect the corruption goes all the
way to the top.  My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI,
and Congress. I have said to The Supreme Court that the issues can
all be boiled down to one question: Is The United States Supreme Court
prepared to stop the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia from functioning like common criminals?"



Windsor says: "If The Supreme Court fails to act against these federal judges, the citizens of the United States
need to know that there is not a shred of decency, honesty, or
Constitutional rights in our federal courts.  Corruption has consumed
the federal court system,
and we now live in a police state.  Judges are free to do absolutely
anything they want.  Our laws are meaningless.  Your life savings can be
stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law
in the books."




The Supreme Court may render its decision before the end of the year.  It's one retired grandpa against the United States government.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Say something constructive. Negative remarks and name-calling are not allowed.